Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pol Wattanakul vs Gabriel Donev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wattanakul vs Donev analysis and find out who is favored!
Pol Wattanakul vs Gabriel Donev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wattanakul 1 - 0 Donev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wattanakul has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Donev has won 48.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wattanakul, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Donev has won 53.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wattanakul has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Donev has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wattanakul has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 8/ 7), with Donev winning 45.71% (W/L 16/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wattanakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Donev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 158/ 108), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Wattanakul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 7), where as Donev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.71% of matches (W/L 16/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wattanakul winning 1 times and Donev being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wattanakul winning 2 and Donev winning 0. The last match between Wattanakul and Donev was at the M15 Doha, 11-03-2020, First, Hard with Pol Wattanakul getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wattanakul and Donev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wattanakul winning 0 times and Donev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wattanakul winning 0, and Donev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wattanakul has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Donev has played against players with an average rank of 211.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wattanakul has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Donev has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wattanakul has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Donev has converted 45.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
631
Rank
598
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
882
Rank
782
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
45% (112-139)
Career Total W/L
58% (189-139)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$2,420
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Pol Wattanakul vs Gabriel Donev For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wattanakul VS Donev
Sportsbook
Offer
Wattanakul VS Donev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Pol Wattanakul | Gabriel Donev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (26/42) | 75% (39/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (22/26) | 46% (18/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 31% (4/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (30/52) | 24% (10/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wattanakul VS Donev H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Gabriel Donev
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pol Wattanakul | Gabriel Donev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (24/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (208/186) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 66 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 122.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (702/1195) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (466/702) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (237/493) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (62/137) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (486/1131) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Pol Wattanakul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Kody Pearson
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Pol Wattanakul
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
2
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
11
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chukang Wang
Player
Pol Wattanakul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Tao Mu
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Jimmy Yang
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jin
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Wattanakul
Player
He Ziheng
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Gabriel Donev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Gabriel Donev
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Donev
Player
Nicolas Villalon
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
36%
(
10 of
28)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Donev
Player
Maxim Zhukov
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Gabriel Donev
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Donev
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Donev
Player
Vlado Jankanj
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Gabriel Donev
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Anthony Ivanov
Player
Gabriel Donev
47%
(
63 of
135)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
125)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
11
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
51%
(
37 of
72)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
41%
(
55 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
125)
136
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Gabriel Donev
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
41%
(
16 of
39)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Donev
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Wattanakul Vs Donev Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wattanakul are available here and Donev photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gabriel Donev
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
